|
FLUORIDE 30 (2) 1997, pp 119-121 |
International Society for Fluoride Research | Table of Contents |
|
|
ANTIRESORPTIVE THERAPY, ANABOLIC THERAPY, AND EXERCISE EFFECTS
ON BONE MASS, STRUCTURE, AND STRENGTH ASSESSED IN A RAT MODEL
Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Charlotte Hasselholt Søgaard MD
Aarhus, Denmark
Abstracted from PhD thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark, 1994
Osteoporosis can be therapeutically approached in two different ways: by use of antiresorptive agents (for example estrogen and bisphosphonates) or by use of anabolic agents (for example parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fluoride). Osteoporosis becomes clinically relevant when the patient presents with a fracture. Because of a high surface to volume ratio, disproportionately more trabecular than cortical bone is lost. Consequently, the typical osteoporotic fractures are those of the spine (vertebral compression fractures), the femoral neck (hip fracture), and the distal radius (Colles' fracture); all of which are sites of large amounts of trabecular bone. The most serious osteoporotic fracture is that of the femoral neck, as it is painful, necessitates hospitalization and causes considerable morbidity and mortality.
For more than 30 years, sodium fluoride (NaF) has been a commonly used therapy for established osteoporosis. Its anabolic effect on trabecular bone mass, particularly in the spine, has been repeatedly documented. However, structural abnormalities or mineralization defects in the bone formed during fluoride administration have been demonstrated in several studies, thus indicating that the increase in bone mass is not necessarily paralleled by an improved bone quality.
Furthermore, long-term clinical investigations using fracture rate as a true end-point have now become available, and the results are conflicting. Some studies have shown that NaF reduces vertebral fracture rate. In contrast, three recent controlled trials have failed to demonstrate any therapeutic advantage of NaF over placebo with respect to vertebral fracture rate. In addition, there have been several reports of an increased incidence of non-vertebral fractures during fluoride administration.
Not much attention has been paid to fluoride's effect on bone biomechanics. Bone biopsies for measurement of bone strength in fluoride-treated osteoporotic patients are not readily available, and to our knowledge only one such investigation has been performed. In that study, a dramatic decrease in iliac crest bone strength and quality was found after 5 years of therapy (Søgaard et al. Bone 15 (4) 393-399 1994, abstract in Fluoride 27 (4) 229 1994).
There have been several animal studies focusing on bone strength during fluoride administration. No study to date has focused on the effect of fluoride on bone quality at a site of combined cortical and trabecular bone.
The vast majority of the clinical studies evaluating the effect of different preventive and therapeutic strategies in osteoporosis have used bone mass or bone histomorphometry as an end-point. This is logical, since bone biomechanical competence is not a readily available parameter in humans.
It has, however, recently become apparent that bone mass should be combined with determination of bone strength and quality when treatment regimens for osteoporosis are evaluated. In order to avoid invasive intervention in humans, bone strength can be evaluated only by making fracture rate the true end-point in clinical research. Since fracture occurs late in life, and preventive strategies should be initiated maybe 15 years ahead, such studies will be of long duration, unless they are of cross-sectional nature.
Seen in that light, longitudinal studies on small animals are attractive. Many of the animal experiments concerning the effect of various therapeutic agents or exercise on the skeleton have been based upon measurement of bone mass or on bone histomorphometry. Only a minority have focused on bone biomechanics, and then cortical bone strength has usually been the parameter measured.
To achieve a more clinically relevant evaluation, the present investigation has chosen to measure the effects of the various regimens on bone strength in the skeletal sites typical for osteoporotic fracture, namely the femoral neck and the vertebral body.
The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the effect on bone biomechanical competence of current therapies (fluoride and estrogen) or potential therapies (PTH, bisphosphonates, PTH co-therapy with an antiresorptive agent, and exercise) in treatment or prophylaxis of osteoporosis, assessed in either rat femoral neck and rat femoral body, or both.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Key words: Anabolic therapy, Antiresorptive therapy, Bone mass, Bone strength, Exercise, Fluoride therapy,
Osteoporosis, Rat model.
Reprints: Dr Charlotte H Søgaard, Department of Connective Tissue Biology, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus
C, Denmark.
|
FLUORIDE 30 (2) 1997, pp 119-121 |
International Society for Fluoride Research |
|
|
Home |
Table of Contents |
ISFR Board |
Subscription Submissions | Announcements | Authors | Subject Index |